I think that counts as grooming.
At least read the Wikipedia page on grooming before arguing from ignorance, bye:
> Sexual grooming is the action or behavior used to establish an emotional connection with a vulnerable person under the age of consent– and sometimes the victim's family, to lower their inhibitions with the objective of sexual abuse. It can occur in various settings, including online, in person, and through other means of communication. Children who are groomed may experience mental health issues, including "anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and suicidal thoughts".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_grooming







"If youre not crying, shitting and throwing up after this was cancelled you're against artistic expression and want to lynch artists"
it's very funny that people want to act like criticism and reaction isn't part of the territory that comes with making art to begin with, and as if the audience is an irrelevant factor when it comes to commercial art. and that's before you get to the role and influence of art in culture and society in general. good thing jaxx/their team/publisher has more sense (of self-preservation at least) than their "defenders".
Recognizing that they couldn't make the premise work and their ignorance on a particular historical period says more about Jaxx's artistic integrity than publishing trash would have had. Kill your darlings and all that