I've come to read discussions about this BL but wtf is going on in this comment section??? Who groomed a minor and WHAT ????
No one groomed a minor.
People got mad at Morning Diamond for calling them out on their bad behaviors and for telling the truth. They went to impersonating him and cyberstalkering him. The one claiming this is an alt of the cyberstalkers. They treid to frame him as a pedophile knowingly he is innocent. They added grooming later showing they are lying. Then they keep change or adding them. it is cyberstalkers pretending to be trolls trying to troll their target with framing him on something they did.
Funny how this starts with the cyberstalkers target's talking about the story or defending someone. If you were attacked we would care.
TM could come in talking about Dan and they will start this.
Morning could come defend you from attacks and they will start this.
IF they targets talk about the story they will start this. If they talke about Heesung and potato they will start this.
TM talked about Heesung and they started it.
Morning talked about Potato and they stated it.
The problem is deeper than you think. So if we talk about Heesung and Potato they will start it. They are cyberstalking us because they were proven wrong and got called out on their actions.
They are cyberstalkers. They will not stop. They did not stop when they had none of their targets for over 20 days. Their targets came in talking about the story and they started it.
I wished you were right but the cyberstalkers need to accept that it is essential to recognize that opinions can differ, and respectful dialogue is crucial. However, harassment and impersonation are unacceptable behaviors, regardless of differing viewpoints. lying is unacceptable too.
The people saying it's weird.... it's just a cute little extra to celebrate kids day... YALL are the weird ones for even having such thoughts
say it louderrr
LOUDER!!!
I do find it very pedo since why is there a need to make one of the lovers a child? They engage in sex in these stories, there is no need to make them minors.
And the "you're weird cause you thought that" is a very lousy argument. So if I find this inappropriate this means I engage in the acts? If I think stealing is wrong I'm a robber? Lousy. Argument.
Oh brother Would you call everyone making children's day art of their characters who are in a romantic relationship pedophiles then?? They aren't engaging in anything sexual. Why cant people draw their characters as an age that they aren't w/o being called creeps.
They can. They will. And I'm not saying this makes them pedo. I'm saying I'm not weird for being uncomfortable with it.
It can get some people uncomfortable , but calling this pedo would be wrong, it would be same as calling a person pedo as the person they are attracted to them once was a kid, moreover JJK is not even attracted to him, I hope you understand my point thank you
I can understand your point that both sides might be overreacting but some of us seen more, heard more on the media and are more concerned and might interpret things differently then people who are less aware (doesn't equal bad, just less aware).
Exactly, people might interpret things in a, wrong manner , so it's better to wait for author to explain these things themselves,and thank you for understanding my point of view
not to get offended by smallest things on the internet challenge: failed
True