i9dk O:) cactus printed boxer[underwear].
*Most are postponed*
[우종우]
https://www.bomtoon.com/detail/SHKhttps://www.mangago.me/read-manga/after_a_meal/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/oni_to_tengoku/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/oni_to_tengoku_sai/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/oni_to_tengoku_kyuu/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/happy_together_paradise_scans/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/bait/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/sun_kindergarten_classmates/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/wuthering_heights_ppang/https://www.mangago.me/read-manga/double_down/#bringmyshitback-8k-10k
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
; -
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0226503&type=printablehttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/271401315_What_Makes_Characters'_Bad_Behaviors_Acceptable_The_Effects_of_Character_Motivation_and_Outcome_on_Perceptions_Character_Liking_and_Moral_Disengagementc/;
Critical Thinking by Richard Paul & Linda Elder
https://books.google.com/books/about/Critical_Thinking.html?id=yBzzDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=yhttps://www.scribd.com/document/898658686/Paul-Elder-3rd-EdThinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman
https://cdn.bookey.app/files/pdf/book/en/thinking--fast-and-slow.pdfhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B20QMSFOSZ5kVERaVkd6NUhOMDg/view?resourcekey=0-7ziuw52J6oRAUXsQihwOSg(P/Mh);
https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/educational-resources/dsm-5-fact-sheetshttps://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/24291-diagnostic-and-statistical-manual-dsm-5https://www.appi.org/dsmhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2167702620917459https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562972/fullhttps://www.treatmyocd.com/what-is-ocd/common-fears/if-i-like-lolicon-does-it-mean-im-a-pedophile-a-therapists-viewhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797619854706https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe5641https://www.sciencefocus.com/comment/brain-myth-25-developmenthttps://slate.com/technology/2022/11/brain-development-25-year-old-mature-myth.htmlhttps://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1297&context=intuitionhttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10138526/https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2796830/https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3689871/https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10506952/https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2024292118https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299414039_Development_Reliability_and_Validity_of_the_Moral_Identity_Questionnairehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30917709/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281333817_Expressive_writing_and_health_self-regulation_of_emotionrelated_experiencehttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/5442906_Expressive_Writing_Buffers_Against_Maladaptive_Ruminationhttps://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-01181-018https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/abs/10.1027/1864-1105/a000027?journalCode=zmphttps://iocdf.org/faith-ocd/living-with-ocd-religious-traditions/moral-scrupulosity/(S+);
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14681994.2021.1937599https://ajce.scholasticahq.com/article/17205-teaching-paraphilias-with-the-dsm-5-learning-the-distinction-between-difference-and-disorderhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14681994.2018.1486029https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1158136021001080https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1300/J070v14n04_02https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15240657.2021.1913341https://academic.oup.com/smoa/article/3/4/321/6956228https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289368254_The_Prevalence_of_Paraphilic_Interests_and_Behaviors_in_the_General_Population_A_Provincial_Surveyhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/361233772_What_Do_We_Know_About_the_Effects_of_Pornography_After_Fifty_Years_of_Academic_Researchhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10538712.2020.1801935https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224490802624406https://summit.sfu.ca/_flysystem/fedora/2024-06/b22644593.pdfWhy Fiction Is Good for You by Keith Oatley
https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/chaning_our_minds+
https://shakesandbakes.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/article-why-fiction-is-good-for-you1.pdfExperiencing Narrative Worlds by Richard J. Gerrig
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780429500633/experiencing-narrative-worlds-richard-gerrighttps://books.google.com/books/about/Experiencing_Narrative_Worlds.html?id=_pZNDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=yGeneral//C;
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-media-psychology-5210628https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/media-psychologyhttps://www.sciencenewstoday.org/how-the-brain-interprets-reality-a-neuroscience-perspectivehttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fiction/https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/perception-and-reality-the-intricate-web-of-cognitive-processes.pdfhttps://sciencefix.blog/fiction-vs-reality-stories-shape-beliefshttps://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-logic/chapter/chapter-2-evaluating-arguments/https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2022/12/28/arguments/(+): The Myth of Media Violence by Jonathan Freedman
https://books.google.com.ph/books/about/Media_Violence_and_Its_Effect_on_Aggress.html?id=nXG1AAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=yThe Moral Psychology of Fiction by Gregory Currie
https://australianhumanitiesreview.org/1996/04/01/the-moral-psychology-of-fiction/+ (Philosophical)
https://iai.tv/articles/art-doesnt-make-us-better-humans-auid-2029https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Problem-of-Satisfaction-Conditions-and-the-of-Salis/72fff8eb0f2045632dc397e220e96900068b756bhttps://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Three-Faces-of-Desire-Schroeder/688191b680fb850f97622f1bae1bff62d9a4dee0https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Imagination%2C-Desire%2C-and-Irrationality%3A-A-Defense-Guo/b3144401c7d74a3270cd8f5cfc48607ecb6f9b47(+): The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt
https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Righteous_Mind.html?id=U21BxGfm3RUC&redir_esc=yThe Death of the Author by Roland Barthes
https://cdn.bookey.app/files/pdf/book/en/the-death-of-the-author.pdfhttps://thinkingliterature.com/death-of-the-author-roland-barthes-summary/https://writing.upenn.edu/~taransky/Barthes.pdfFolk Devils and Moral Panics by Stanley Cohen
https://infodocks.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/stanley_cohen_folk_devils_and_moral_panics.pdfhttps://books.google.com/books/about/Folk_Devils_and_Moral_Panics.html?id=_mITYS47AU0C&redir_esc=yhttps://soztheo.com/criminology/key-works-in-criminology/stanley-cohen-folk-devils-and-moral-panics-1972/#google_vignetteThe Literary Animal by Jonathan Gottschall
https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Literary_Animal.html?id=LSkCL0r_DLoC&redir_esc=y(+):
Encoding/Decoding
Reception Theory
Narrative Transportation
https://www.mcm.uni-wuerzburg.de/fileadmin/06110300/2024/Pdfs/Green___Appel__2024__Advances_Preprint.pdfSocial Desirability Bias
Scrupulosity
Catharsis in psychology
S/M/B;
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/psychological-effects-of-watching-crime-showshttps://www.bu.edu/learninglab/files/2012/05/Corriveau-Chen-Harris-in-press.pdfhttps://www.pewresearch.org/topic/internet-technology/technology-policy-issues/online-harassment-bullying/https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/23/3/163/4962541https://www.propwatch.org/propaganda.phphttps://www.britannica.com/topic/propagandahttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20563051211021378https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280632123_Emotions_Partisanship_and_Misperceptions_How_Anger_and_Anxiety_Moderate_the_Effect_of_Partisan_Bias_on_Susceptibility_to_Political_Misinformationhttps://books.google.com/books/about/The_Nature_of_Hate.html?id=rM7LCgAAQBAJhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/13548565231193694JSTOR (Archive)
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20620397https://www.jstor.org/stable/27124897https://www.jstor.org/stable/26803447https://www.jstor.org/stable/41486943https://www.jstor.org/stable/1389563https://www.jstor.org/stable/429900https://www.jstor.org/stable/43737440https://www.jstor.org/stable/24642797 f/n;
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575427/fullhttps://researchmap.jp/mtwrmtwr/published_papers/26017547https://www.yorku.ca/mar/van%20Monsjou%20&%20Mar%202019_PACA_Interest%20and%20investment%20in%20fictional%20relationships_w%20Corr.pdfhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/352313677_Adult_attachment_and_engagement_with_fictional_charactershttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/335647294_The_textual_features_of_fiction_that_appeal_to_readers_Emotion_and_abstractnesshttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10225679/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339080260_Fiction_and_morality_Investigating_the_associations_between_reading_exposure_empathy_morality_and_moral_judgmenthttps://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5695&context=etdhttps://urresearch.rochester.edu/institutionalPublicationPublicView.action?institutionalItemId=5822https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23268743.2025.2491506https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282049471_Violence_in_Literature_An_Evolutionary_Perspectivehttps://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/28062/chapter-abstract/212050209https://www.academia.edu/2277956/Fact_Fiction_and_Committing_Murder_some_of_the_ethical_issues_associated_with_writing_historical_crime_fictionhttps://crimereads.com/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-about-crime-fiction-and-love-it-as-horror/https://electricliterature.com/who-gets-to-write-about-sexual-abuse-and-what-do-we-let-them-say/https://unherd.com/2023/01/whats-wrong-with-violent-fiction/-;
https://safersociety.org/understanding-child-sexual-grooming-part-1-beyond-the-myths-to-the-reality/https://neurolaunch.com/what-is-grooming-behavior/https://www.thedeafhotline.org/blog/six-stages-of-grooming/https://enoughabuse.org/get-the-facts/predators-pedophiles-rapists-and-other-sex-offenders/https://academic.oup.com/book/9669https://www.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/US-NCMEC-OJJDP-Child-Molesters-A-Behavioral-Analysis-Lanning-2010.pdfhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/9/506?utmhttps://www.jurist.org/features/2024/11/20/the-silent-predator-protecting-children-in-the-age-of-generative-artificial-intelligence/https://www.icmec.org/online-grooming-of-children-for-sexual-purposes-model-legislation-global-review/https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol58/iss2/3/M/C;
https://www.article19.org/resources/inhope-members-reporting-artwork-as-child-sexual-abuse/https://www.umsl.edu/~gradyf/theory/1930code.pdfhttps://ro.uow.edu.au/articles/journal_contribution/The_World_of_Yaoi_The_Internet_Censorship_and_the_Global_Boys_Love_Fandom/27714690https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.18574/nyu/9781479866625.001.0001/htmlhttps://books.google.com/books/about/Anti_Fandom.html?id=FL11DwAAQBAJ (OP)
https://prostasia.org/blog/criminalizing-art-and-fiction-is-a-bridge-too-far-for-the-united-nations/https://prostasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Research-proposal-concept-note.pdfhttps://forum.prostasia.org/t/drawings-cartoons-and-3d-cgi-are-not-csam/1349https://forum.prostasia.org/t/what-do-you-think-about-the-claims-made-in-this-article/4323.
https://www.reddit.com/r/FanFiction/comments/locmgr/you_cant_be_a_pedophile_just_based_off_of_liking/.
.DO NOT READ.
>a tendency online for people to turn personal dislike into moral judgment instead of just admitting something isnt for them.. and to not really try to understand others intentions—just sticking to a first impression. Instead of accepting that people enjoy different things, some feel the need to justify their preferences by acting like theyre morally superior. People engage with fiction in different ways. while it's valid to find certain content uncomfortable or weird, and set personal boundaries, jumping straight to labeling or treating fictional material as real harm just derails the conversation. escalating those boundaries into harassment or moral panic over fiction contributes little of value. Fiction has always included difficult or controversial themes, [dark, taboo fiction] and engaging with them does not automatically reflect someones real-life beliefs. People are already capable of handling heavy topics in structured settings.
.
(Stories can evoke strong emotions or introduce unfamiliar perspectives.)
.
>subjectivity is unavoidable, attempts to police what others may or may not engage w/ just enforce one perspective over everyone else. Defaulting to censorship just strips away nuance. Media isnt entirely neutral, but it also doesnt control people its effects depend on interpretation, environment, and individual mindset. -treating it as a simple cause and effect is reductive and acting like it directly dictates behavior is an oversimplification that leads to unnecessary censorship.
.
>the inability to distinguish between fiction and reality is an individual responsibility— influence happens if you let it. assuming harmful intent just bcs you interpret it that way ignores the range of perspectives people bring. If you approach everything expecting the worst, thats the conclusion you'll reach—but that reflects your perspective more than the work itself.
.
>.annoying. entering certain forms of media solely to criticize and complain about their recurring elements, particularly through repetitive questioning "why is it always this," "why does this exist," "how can someone make something like this" "why put this here, it's unnecessary"—or pointing out the obvious as if it changes anything. These remarks do not influence the existence or direction of the content, nor do they stop its production*content* or contribute constructively to discourse.
.
>sanitizing or reframing works "pure" "wholesome" or "normal," or suddenly labeling them as "problematic" depending on what fits a certain narrative, while ignoring everything that doesnt, reduces the work into something easier to consume rather than engaging with it as it is and shifts away from the work itself toward judgments of the authors intentions, ethics, or morality, and extending to their other works to reinforce that stance.
.
>content is criticized while revisions that make it more acceptable are praised. If a work fundamentally conflicts with certain values, altering its presentation does not meaningfully change that. it becomes less about the content being "problematic"and more about the desire/wanting to engage with it without discomfort. (or making it clear they dont associate with "that"while still engaging with it to avoid being seen as those people.)lol -when- such changes are framed as improvements, reshaping materials to appeal to people who were never the intended audience removes what made it distinct in the first place. Entering spaces built around niche or unconventional interests and questioning their lack of "normalcy " overlooks their purpose entirely.
.
>Ultimately, the choice to engage with or avoid such material rests with the individual, and expecting it to conform to -moral-/personal preferences is neither reasonable nor productiveXXXDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDXDDDDDXDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD. -Including calling a piece a "waste" simply bcs it doesn't appeal to you, its just baseless dismissal. An author/artist still put in effort, intent, and creative thought to produce that work, regardless of personal taste. criticism is valid and necessary. Theres a clear difference between constructive criticism and repetitive, surface-level complaints rooted in dissatisfaction.
Not everything is meant for everyone, and expecting it to be is where the problem starts.
edit:5
https://x.com/SuperBearNeo/status/2027835705196429660https://x.com/purity_culture/status/1614285461639364609https://x.com/Reindeeric/status/1980610633121820915.
https://x.com/JasonKPargin/status/2040802173110354064https://x.com/calisabooks/status/2044130043220169084.
https://loli.aishitei.ru/research.html.
https://x.com/Sirikamiloli/status/2045905935399567799-
https://www.tiktok.com/@caseylytle 
CTE speedrun