MichaelJacksons_SpecialOne

I'm hella confused. Is your topic about abortion or is it about murder and justifications?

Tattoo artist gave me a bad tattoo, the mental trauma cannot be undone, my quality of life has lowered in general, the tattoo artist deserves to die.

your logic doesn’t make sense tbh.

so if someone causes a crash (complete accident) but it permanently injures someone they should die?

so people who kill in self defence should die?

Is that what I said? No. The type of murder I speak of is intentionally, something someone did on purpose. Nothing about accidental injuries, murders, severe crimes that can't be forgiven

If you're a bit confused because of my statement on abortion that was more of a hook than anything else.

the introduction is not a good opening for the rest of the essay, it is merely for shock value. objectively, its a structural mess. there is an issue of correlation. you have something you want to talk about so talk about that.

Your quality of life can not be lowered because you don't like your tattoo, do you think victims of rape and pedophilia only suffer mentally?

It's about if all murder is bad or unethical, the abortion part was more of a hook than anything

im referring to if u are hoping to continue your segue of abortion to the ethics of murder. personally, the logic is not sensible regardless. i would advise you use a different topic

I got fired and no one wants to employ me because of my botched tattoo :'(

but you didn’t say that? you said ‘i don’t believe it’s bad to kill a muderer,it shouldn’t even be debated,you took someone’s life what gives you the right to continue living’

if your only talking about certain circumstances you should clarify that.

you have to decide which disciple you want to focus on whether it be medically, theologically, psychologically, socially, etc. in the construction of your arguments.

as it is currently, it is obvious that not much thought has been put into the topic. the ideas are jumbled and the disciplines overlap. these issues give way for contradiction. you should do research instead of relying solely on your morals

Just a curious question to op hmm : Why do you think murder is punishable by death? Because like you clarified later, murder can be for various, various reasons. Revenge, self defense, serial addiction, under substance influence, accidental, justice (something you are proposing is murder for justice; ie; death penalty). What is the institution of measure you'll use to decide whether this specific type of murder is worthy of a death penalty? Don't you think it might get messy and unfair sometimes? Just curiousss. But I agree with death penalty for rapists and pedophiles.

Lmao this is literally just me yapping about something I've been giving alot of thought lately, it's not meant to make much sense since I'm really just typing it out to put my own thoughts about the subject in a more clear order, but it seems It didn't come off like that

I believe it should be punishable by death because a life is not something you can give back, taking a life is not something someone should be able to come back from, to be forgiven for. You took someone's life, so why do you deserve yours? Especially if they've taken multiple

And I don't necessarily believe it will be a smooth and easy going process, nor fair. And there's nothing to measure unless the murder was committed in self defense or for a good cause (but then there is argument for what a good cause is), if not either of and intentional I believe the perpetrator should be put to death.

Killing someone by accident (ex:Car crash or workplace mistake) shouldn't be punishable by death

Well I definitely never said my logic applied to all circumstances, did I? Not only that the only a clear focus point was "is it wrong to kill a murderer", as in someone who took someone's life with intention.

Do you believe a person killed in a car accident was murdered? That someone killed by way if an accident or mistake was murdered? I don't

What about drunk driving?

What apart of my logic do you think not makes sense? When I wrote this (at six in the morning mind you) I was kinda just letting the words flow however I wanted, this isn't all that serious to me, just something I've been thinking about and thought about writing about so I knew my logic wouldn't make complete sense, I am just in highschool but I wouldn't mind some criticism to hopefully help me construct it in away to be more understanding

It wasn't intentional so I wouldn't say its outright murder but they did something irresponsible that took a life, so still a serious offense that deserves jail time (ten years at most)

Ur funny asf

1. abortion is murder because it will become a person. that is an argument on science and cellular development

2. is all murder bad? relative to the paragraph about abortion is missing context because all you provided was that you personally believe that fetus = person. you have only established that you view equality between the two.

abortion - an act of intentional removal of a fetus (lets say speaking only medically). murder - an act of intentional and unintentional ending of a person’s life. state more clearly your definition of what exactly is murder and what kind of murder you are focusing on

3. abortion because what if it grows to be a terrible person. that is a hypothetical. you have now gone into philosophical fields. very abstract, contrast to your first argument on abortion that is more scientifically ground

4. murdering a person who has done bad. moral philosophy once again. “you took someone’s life so what gives you the right to continue living?” why do you think sp? what RIGHT are you referring to? what moral code are u citing? arent you just ranting about your personal beliefs?

5. lowering quality of life. this is a societal concept, social and economic. again, you have added another field to your argument. expound on how it lowers quality of life. why argue societal with the philosophical and the scientific with little actual research

6. so many I me my. what makes you think your belief is correct and worth listening to? is what you are saying even true?

i used to grade essays and my favorite to do were creative writing. highschoolers tend to rant about what they strongly believe in without accounting for everything else. shower thoughts shouldn’t always be put into writing lol. i strongly advise that if u pursue this topic to please add as much facts as you possibly can

discipline* idk why that was disciple lol

theres also many things murder can be extended to like in cases of neglect or indirect contribution. its like that case where a healthcare ceo was murdered because the structure of health insurance and healthcare in general have no regard for actual patients. op only mentioned cases in the extreme without actually taking time to establish what definition of murder is being talked about here

It's because it's not a romantic relationship it's an abusive relationship between someone in power or control and someone vulnerable
It's rape and violation and a crime
It's not a relationship or a feeling that u may understand or accept

Definitely some sort of trauma or mental illness. Just no fucking way

I am not talking about actual victims of incest, I am referring to people that get off to it and probably have never experienced anything like it.

For example there are plenty of people that will watch a piece of media with brothers in it and want to see them fucking each other, does that seem right to you?

The people I speak of see incest as something to get off to.

Oh it's because they like the taboo elements of it
Ppl are more drown to smth that is prohibited more that being drown to smth available