taytayy

I just started and I don't get it either. She went after him but then she won't talk and when they drag her she starts yelling as if anybody forced her to approach the guy in the first place idk what her problem is like...

Yes, you are crazy

She could choose to be better...but no.

You're not alone. See, let's imagine if we reframe the narrative around Rashta. Rather than vilifying her, acknowledge the tragic circumstances that shaped her actions. As a slave girl exploited, manipulated, and scapegoated by those in power, Rashta's experiences should evoke empathy, not condemnation. Her youth – just 17 at the end of her life – underscores the heartbreaking reality that she was forced to navigate a treacherous adult world (everyone else is around 30 years old and also educated, while she didn't even know how to read at the start), she was robbed of her childhood and agency. We should pity Rashta, not blame her. When it came to power dynamics, the adults here were the irresponsible ones, also the Empress should have known better than to blame a CHILD, a slave child since 9 years old thanks to HER SLAVE POLICIES that allows children to become slaves for their parents faults.

Let's examine the circumstances surrounding Rashta's actions. It's crucial to acknowledge that Rashta was an uneducated slave, subjected to exploitation and abuse by those in power. As an enslaved child, she was denied agency, autonomy, and basic human rights. The power dynamics at play were starkly unfair, with Rashta at the mercy of her oppressors.
Given this context, it's essential to recognize that Rashta's choices were severely limited. She was forced to navigate a world where her body and actions were controlled by others. The "bad stuff" she chose to do was, in many cases, a survival strategy – a desperate attempt to exert some control over her circumstances.
It's also important to acknowledge the class dynamics at play. Rashta's enslavement and exploitation were direct results of her socio-economic status. Those in power, who abused and manipulated her, were products of a system that perpetuated inequality and oppression.
In this light, Rashta's actions can be seen as a response to the systemic injustices she faced. Rather than condemning her, we should critique the power structures that enabled her exploitation and abuse. By doing so, we can work towards a more nuanced understanding of Rashta's experiences and the broader social context in which she lived.

Yeah, totally irrational to feel empathy for a child who was exploited, molested, and enslaved. I mean, who needs compassion when you have powerful adults who enabled and profited from her suffering? Let's definitely prioritize their feelings and justify their actions. That sounds like a totally healthy and not-at-all-problematic approach.

This is just a fantasy story. And no I don't feel compassion for that character. I don't care if she was an abused child. She did all she did being an adult...so no. I don't care. And I think she is well being dead af like she is..and I love the way she died too. The story really did justice ╮(￣▽￣)╭

@Ohmarwin Why you have your replies turned off? BTW to answer your last comment,
I strongly disagree with you. Fantasy stories shape our perceptions and empathy, and by rooting for the royals and celebrating Rashta's demise, we're condoning a narrative that justifies slavery, exploitation, and silencing marginalized voices. Rashta's backstory would typically evoke sympathy, but the narrative cleverly shifts focus away from systemic injustices. This story desensitizes us to marginalized struggles and perpetuates harmful attitudes. If Rashta's story were presented differently, we'd likely root for her as a complex character fighting oppression. Instead, we're encouraged to applaud her demise, reinforcing a dangerous dynamic where the powerful are justified and the marginalized are blamed.

I think your perspective grossly underestimates the vile decisions she made when she DID have a choice. She was innocent when she entered the palace, even navier didn't blame her, as shovishit was the only one at fault. But she continued to ignore everyone who ever gave her good advice, and prioritised her desires to be empress over her own safety. She could have been a comfortable mistress, who eventually made a name for herself and possibly leave the palace and that nightmare of a man behind. But instead she tortured maids, ordered for people to be killed, abused animals and meticulously stole for her benefit. She had a victim complex which you can argue she has the right to, but humans have to be responsible for their actions regardless of the motive. She is pitiable and I was quite sad at her death, but it was justified. Her inferiority complex cost her life. What I am most disappointed in is that it's seems like the perpetrator for all this is sort of costing by. If he really doesn't die by the end of this I think it would be a horrible ending to the story.

I understand your perspective, but I strongly disagree. Rashta's actions, although flawed and hurtful, were a direct result of the trauma, abuse, and manipulation she suffered at the hands of those in power. So I'll break it down, to emphasize the points in my response.
The Vulnerability of a Child;
Let's not forget that Rashta was a 17-year-old child, navigating a treacherous world of adult politics and manipulation. She was forced to confront 30-year-old adults with higher education and social status, who exploited her vulnerability and naivety.
Isolation and Betrayal;
Rashta's isolation in her position made her even more susceptible to manipulation. Who could she trust when everyone she had trusted in the past had betrayed her? Her experiences had taught her that the only person she could rely on was herself, leading her to make decisions that, although hurtful, were a desperate attempt to survive and thrive.
The Cycle of Abuse;
Rashta's actions were a product of the cycle of abuse she endured. Her "vile decisions" were a coping mechanism, a result of the trauma and pain inflicted upon her. To condemn her without acknowledging the systemic injustices and abuse that shaped her behavior is unfair and neglects the complexity of her story.
Lack of Agency and Support;
You mention that Rashta ignored good advice and prioritized her desires, but let's not forget that she was a slave, stripped of her autonomy and agency. She was not given the luxury of making choices that would lead to a comfortable life. Instead, she was forced to fight for scraps of power and validation in a system designed to keep her oppressed.
The Danger of Victim-Blaming;
While it's true that Rashta developed a victim complex, it's essential to recognize that this was a coping mechanism, a result of the abuse and trauma she endured. Blaming Rashta for her actions without acknowledging the systemic injustices that led to her behavior is a form of victim-blaming.
Accountability and Justice;
I agree that Rashta's actions had consequences, and she must be held accountable. However, let's not forget that the true perpetrators of abuse and oppression – those who held power and manipulated Rashta – must also face justice.
A Nuanced Perspective;
Rashta's story is complex, multifaceted, and deserving of nuance. Rather than condemning her as a one-dimensional villain, let's strive to understand the intricate web of circumstances that led to her actions.
Rashta's punishment was excessively cruel, especially for a 17-year-old.
Isolating her in a dark tower is psychological torture, eroding her mental state without providing opportunity for growth or redemption. Ultimately, she was condemned not for her actions as a royal, but for daring to aspire beyond her station as a slave, highlighting the ugly truth that she was seen as less than human.

No girl you're not crazy , the way people despise rashta but undermine the impact of sovietchu's action are pure misogyny imo

That's exactly it, rashta was a complex character and though she was infuriating at times it was because she was well written . The character had nuances and I think she was a far better antagonist than sovietchu that falls pretty flat imo. She was definitely against our fl but if we saw the WHOLE thing through HER eyes I'm persuaded she would've just been seen as a good villainess that fought for her future (as seen in other manwhas). I think it was a real shame how she ended up, this character deserved to outlive sovietchu! I think she should've been the "final boss" as empress ruling alone against our Fl. They could've even reached mutual understanding even while still hating each other or smt it would've been interesting (as much as i love navier she never truly understood the hardship that rashta faced and rashta was too much in her own bubble to try to understand navier)

Well you out in a more civilized way. But yeah I'm more in that side. She was a hateful character

i pity her too... her entire life was a shitshow and she was used and led on by sovieshu then she was used and led on by duke ergi, her naviety was her downfall lol shes a shitty person but that doesnt mean u cant feel bad for her, she suffered a lot more than navier and never had proper guidance

i so agree girl.. u put it really well why we humans need to empathize with villains sometimes, but i fear apathy is a tragedy that has consumed many people now its really sad to see people blindly be hateful to rashta without understanding her as a person