everyone calling him dramatic either has a memory of a peanut or zero literacy. Chase literally has depression, mentally disturbed because of his evil brother Grayson and truly believe no one loves him. He's on the rocks even more with him thinking josh has someone with a child etc. Yeah him being unstable is not that far off......
Right I am confused by ppl saying Chase is being dramatic. It’s like have we not been comprehending what we have been reading it’s literally mentioned multiple times how mentally unstable Chase is.he literally wishes to die and has asked Josh to kill him and literally takes so much drugs hoping to never wake up. I am actually surprised he has held on as long as he has.
almost 40 chap in but like there's really no substance between them, the main pair are both empty bc the author is hiding so much and making them mysterious but like there's really no convos between them. I think dangerous convience won't be dethroned as this author's most memorable or loved work. I think the first part of this story was good but not sure about this second half, the rebellion seems weak and futile
PEAK IS BACK but I am scared. bruh the way he didn't regret or have an ounce of change in heart after all the cruel suffering he inflicted on everyone including his children just show he had no development at all.. and in this new chapter it shows their first encounter and then a two year skip, in that skip nothing happened between them but idk its crazy how ML feels no remorse or guilt and just living his life as an asshole, and the first encounter so...like running up to him, calling him a B- and then assaulting him, like poor MC has zero memory but thats how ML acts even after all that went down? damn even in the second life ML cries and feels guilt for seeing what he did in those glimpses of dreams so thats why its hard to see s1 ML come back with no growth
its funny because when I look at couples with babies my first thought is really? why bring a life into this type of world today. everything is plastic, global warming, data centers will take up our water, Elon musk is trillion, Israelis are taking over our media etc and this is coming from a young straight person....like stop reproducing innocent souls to suffer
ok...girl relax I am not condemning straight people. This is literally my own personal thoughts and this is the first time I'm sharing my opinion online about this, I dont go up to people and tell them this y'all heteros wanna be victims so bad and this is again coming from a straight woman. But anyways, it's not senseless judgement. It's literally not economically, environmentally, socially safe to bring anyone. I know 99% of the population disagrees with me, so relax and have your kids. This is just me and my opinion, dont worry the world is already overpopulated and will continue to be overpopulated with capitalistic slaves to the Israeli billionaires that control us.
they weren't even talking about straight people son they just said people who wants babies,, queer couples can want babies too idk wtf u mean
I get what you're saying overall since having children in a struggling environment can mean its a harder life for the baby and the family but its seriously odd how youre mentioning sexuality in a conversation about childrencare in the economic state of the world,, like that's such a no brainer statement
its just a shallow way of thinking that straight people are the only people who want babies and its weird to shame people who want to do good for themselves and not the capitalististic governments who are taking advantage of others
She's literally not shaming anybody she clearly said she don't go up to people calling them out. I think you are cherry picking herr because while it's true queer people want babies too, is straight couples that have it easier when it comes to have babies thus the ones who bring the most children. Is already difficult for a queet couple to adopt. She brings up sexuality because IT MATTERS, mayhe she don't wanna come off as judgmental to straight people by highlighting she's also straight, for straigh women and women in general babies are brought up ever since we started playing with toys, the whole thing of bearing children is often reminded to women and for a heterosexual person is even MORE often. It's not shallow thinking, the way she's speaks about it and says it's the first time sharing it online says that she's been considering many things into account and is not wrong to think this way from a straight person, many people are tired of being expected as a straight person to reproduce and seeing other straight couples being happy for having a child despite the state of the world is completely reasonable, isn't it nice that there's people that care about the wellbeing of someone else's child? Even though they can't prevent children from being conceived, people like her and me wanna change the world into a safer one for those children that are born in this horrible era.
I agree w you, as a queer person i still want kids... But it's so painful to think about their future so if at any point in my life i want children as much as i want biological children i think the best option for me will always be adoption and rather give a better chance to those children in their life
I dont get the point of not wanting to come off judgemental and being judgemental anyways by saying "y'all heteros wanna be victims so bad and this is again coming from a straight woman" when the person she replied to didnt even mention straight people in the first place and was asking a general questionlike op doesnt even know if the person they replied to is straight either so idk why op has to mention "heteros wanna be victims" and they arent condemning straight people when the person didnt even mention straight people in the first place,, the conversation itself is focusing on people who WANT babies in a terrible environment. Like I get what you're saying since depending on your sexuality in a harsher environment can create even more issues and straight people are usually the one making babies but the way she went about it was clearly wrong since some points she mentioned didn't connect to the original question
Im not saying what she thought is wrong either, its just shallow to say people who want families are bringing "capitalistic slaves to the Israeli billionaires that control us" there's people in many parts of the world who relies on having families for income because where they live is so undeveloped, are they purposely bringing capitalistic slaves? no, they're trying to survive in a harsher environment where if u dont have a family life is harder. Approximately 17% to 20% of the global population lives in highly developed countries, while about 83% resides in developing or less developed regions, and globally, nearly 138 million children are engaged in child labor, directly working to help their families survive. In these lesser-developed regions, parents in deeply impoverished households depend on their children's income or unpaid agricultural labor to meet basic household needs such as water, food, and shelter
The ACTUAL ACTUAL problem that people need to realize is the government's exploitation that drives people to extreme poverty which leads to people creating families. In the end, my point still stands, the bigger issue that is governments and mass-produced companies continuously ruining childcare, there isn't a point in bringing sexuality in to a conversation about important issues like this
To me, no side is correct or wrong and it depends on the parent's responsibilities on how they choose to support their children - im a queer person who doesn't want children purely because I am aware of the government and harm in the environment however when you live a much more privileged life in a highly developed country its harder to understand the suffering of impoverished people where they need to rely on big families for basic necessities
you're literally self inserting a whole new topic thats not even related to my original statement for the sake of wanting to argue. The comment I replied to originally said "MAKING babies" not "want" a big difference. Please read more carefully before jumping to conclusions. Girl you don't even know me, you base me off shallow one comment but go ahead I'm not wasting my time
I hope you realize that by the end of your essay you're actually agreeing with the author of the original comment. As for what you quoted, Heterosexual individuals still victimize themselves when it comes to sensitive topics like: abortions; not everyone but still a significant amount of them around the world (i wonder why) so is a valid comment to make as it is a fact. Then again, sex and sexuality does matters and it's not odd to bring it up it is in fact natural when it comes to the *making* of a child, do you understand what i mean? Also She is a straight woman that is criticizing other straight people which makes her opinion fare and non judgmental as she comes from the same position as well.
I agree that having children in poor environments isnt ethical which is why i understand anyone who doesnt want kids because of that, it's not bad to think that way, however the op still said things unnecessary, calling people "capitalistic slaves" is unwarranted, i only stated stuff that people need to take account for when it comes to wanting children in poor environments, in the end it matters on how you view the issue itself
I do see now how the victimization of straight people join in - to me it didn't make sense at first purely because my views rely on things other than sexuality,, i want to clarify that I dont agree with straight people or people who aren't a minority victimizing themselves for no reason & there isn't anything wrong with pointing those issues out,
my issue was the op talking about sexuality when the commentator didnt even mention it in their comment, I understand its importance to bringing a life into this world but i don't find it important when it comes to wanting > which is what I refer to and what the commentator mentions
I have nothing else to say as I feel this will be me explaining clear points in a circle and I would rather read yaoi with my time










ive only read up to ch 8 but how is this gunna be bl, they're both straight as fu to the core lol
Believe me, it's gonna be BL