Well I love this story... If I ignore the r@pe thing, the other is still okay... Well yeah he is 17 but well 7 years age gap is the bad uk... idk why ppl r making a huge deal of it but here it's pretty common in India
I don't care about age gaps so long as both are above 20. Major brain development stops at 20 though the brain keeps developing until 25. The difference between a 16 and 17 year old is much larger than that of a 22 and 23 year old. A 17 year old is very immature and vulnerable compared to a 24 year old (though you can be very mature for 17 and very immature for 24). Basically it is very easy for a 24 year old to even accidently manipulate or lead a 17 year old. I like my partners to be years older than me but I know that I should stick within 1 to 2 years until I am older and more capable of handling that.
He raped a minor. Please don't ignore that. + The official marriage age in India is 18. Below that is illegal but people still do it which is sad. Its litrelly punishable by law. Just coz its common dosent mean its right. It was common for 60 y/o men to marry 15 y/o women in the old ages too. Is it right then? No. + 7 years of age gap is fine when both the parties are above 20. + If someone brings out the Japanese consent age into this then its some pedo shit 100%.
I am not willing to ignore the r@pe part...but it's pretty common in BLs if u have read them... R@pe is NEVER okay... But thr fact that most BLs have this trope, that's why I said that IF only we can cut that part out / ignore it then the rest of the plot is still understandable... I'm sry that I came off wrong in the oc
I don't hate Tom Lee but GOO is AMAZING