Momo

I read a lot of the comments, quite a lot of valid points out there. PERSONALLY I think there needs to be a mix of the Pride and Prejudice thing of some time apart and them working on their relationship together first. I 100% agree that they need time apart to fully heal and learn and most importantly grow. However, where she to leave now as things are they'd never (most likely) get together. They'd grow apart, she would completely move on from him. The problem right now is that he's trying to mend past mistakes of not showing affection. What he and everyone else (around her) fails to realize is that those displays are meaningless if she's not interested and doesn't realize he cares. He can show affection and have some for her without truly caring for her. What he NEEDS to do is show he cares about her as more than a person in his life and prove himself to be someone she can rely on and trust. Not win her heart or make her fall in love, but simply become someone who can be there for her. From there they can build, right now they have no real relationship. Part of the problem is that these people are engaged as children before they can even learn to develop romantic love and are expected to make it work out. Yes, we see couples be affectionate and enjoy each other and there are many things to encourage their happy relationship. However, I will argue that mostly this society promotes outward display of affection and doesn't actively teach building a real relationship from what I've seen. It's mostly been display affection and hopefully you two will figure out past that. Like, Claude decided for his fiancé what's best for her without asking her or talking to someone about it and the only reason why this is known is because of abnormally prying acquaintances. We don't see anyone trying to help (like the parents) characters struggling with their relationships outside of the ML actively asking for help and the FL prying into other's lives (which she doesn't do much of). It SEEMS like there's more of a focus on public displays society can see and judge you from rather than people genuinely learning what a real relationship is and how to overcome struggle. Claude doesn't, again, SEEM to have made an attempt on how to make a romantic relationship with a woman he cares about work with his ambitions and decided for her and seemingly women in general based off his initial comments towards the main character. He might not even believe that women have the strength to withstand such emotional hardships. He also hasn't told her his intention to hopefully end their relationship and just treats her poorly hoping she'll get the hint which she clearly isn't doing. He also doesn't seem to have taken into consideration how his decision will affect her. She has no way of knowing their relationship will end and as a women in this society she has to assume that unless told otherwise she will be with the man she is currently engaged to, he basically is cruelly stringing her along. Additionally he clearly expects her to figure out the relationship thing by herself when, from what we've seen, she won't/can't be the one to decide her relationship as a woman and may not have good prospects outside of him therefore making her search for a new better (for her) partner much more difficult. The male characters care for the women around them but entirely fail to understand the situation any of the women are in (even in Cecily's relationship where she was afraid to admit she has none "womanly hobbies") and I think that another large portion of the character's problems comes from sexism and ignorance.

I'm not sure if its the translation making the story kinda awkward sounding but I like it so far, except that I can't get over the inaccurate description and depiction of DID. DID is when a child suffers such severe abuse that their consciousness splits and their brain creates multiple personalities to protect the main personality. These personalities are often created from a specific thing the main personality needs protection from. So far we have found that while someone who has DID can form new personalities but you can only develope it in the first place as a child. It's an extreme response to extreme abuse. The new personalities are often formed based off images the individual has and what they need that personality to do. An example is a woman, a friend of a family member of mine, who got in a car accident that induced a really bad panic attack (she already had multiple personalities) developed a personality that was a Latin woman that had no fear behind the wheel and took no shit because that's what made the most sense to her brain (people don't pick their personalities, the brain forms them based off of what would make the main personality feel safest taking biases and beliefs into account). Another would be of a young girl who developed a personality of an older boy that would be strong enough to stand up to those who physically hurt her. The main personality often doesn't have the memories of the others because they are meant to shield the main one from moments that are too painful to handle and usually only come out when they need to (though the other personalities can remain in control after the moment). Usually the other personalities have some knowledge of the others and there can be one in charge who's supposed to manage the protection of the main one. Sexuality doesn't have to do with personality
While I'm not sure if the different personalities could be attracted to different types I felt like the implication in the comic was that sexuality had to do with personality which isn't true. I know this is a comic with a very stereotypical depiction of homosexuality. This is just something in particular I care about. I feel like the author could've just done Jekyll and Hyde. "This traumatic incident lead me to want to separate my memories but resulted in me having 2 personalities after I did/was involved in some experiment". They wouldn't need to go too hard into sci-fi or supernatural to do it. Well that's my TED Talk