Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.
Most of these "deep psychological bls" aren't really all that deep
I don't understand the weird superiority complex fujos have about reading dark stories when almost none of them are good or have a plot other than rape and torture for the mc for whatever reason the author could think of, there are no theme, it serves nothing other than the author and reader fetish why can't the readers just admit it to themselves? Sometimes I see people make long ass "analysis" for bls and the shit is all stuff the author 100% did not think of lmao it's like people have to make themselves believe what they are reading as any sort of substance, i guess this is why I can take their "anti censorship" stance seriously, it's always to defend bs porn but never actual books written by queer or black people that are actually getting censored
Whenever I hear someone glaze Harada or that fuckass Married Man/Missing Love or whatever that rapeslop shitfest is called for being a "deep, thought-provoking psychological BL," when in reality any "psychological" aspect of it was shoehorned by these authors into the story last minute just so the wokies don't cancel them on twitter. Like just admi...... reply