I'm sorry but... This is really victim-blaming. The nanny and himself are telling him to h...

You clearly dont know historical drama troups lmao
As shitty as it is, its all about clinging to the thickest thigh but i assure you our little prince loves his male wife dearly and this little wife is just worrying for nothing.

The webtoon misses out alot of internal monologue that can really make you see how genuine our mc is to pursue wifes happiness. And if you are reading the novel you will definitely realise our prince isnt scheming enough to do aphrodisiac.





Plus a hint: did you know its crime to uses aphrodisiac ? Drama is going to go down in the household AHAHAHA

Is there a translated version of the novel?

there is . here's the link

https://chrysanthemumgarden.com/novel-tl/twf/

Yeah I read a few historical manhuas and each time the ML is some crazy bast*rd, I know it. And I know that in this manhua they love each others very much, they are really fluffy together.
But love can't be used as an excuse to force someone to have sex when he has a trauma. I think the MC has to take his time until he's not bothered by physical contact so they can both enjoy the sex.

But why so quick to judge, we, well you still don't know who put the aphrodisiac in his meal.
And regarding intercourse with his spouse, since he came back he never forced mc to have sex with him, he even feel regret about what happened, he was angry at himself so he left but mc misunderstood thinking he was angry at him.

And nanny didn't say anything bad since she doesn't know what happened during the wedding night.
For now there's no victim blaming anywhere.

I know he didn't put the aphrodisiac, and I know that the ML doesn't want to force the MC. The problem here is how the author makes the MC have self-blaming thoughts. That is victim-blaming.

And the nanny did say something bad. It's the same speech that is given everytime to women :" have sex with your husband, even if you don't want bc it's your duty and he can leave you for another if you don't satisfy him "

I agree. No one should rush others or themselves into having intercourse when they’re not ready. When I saw the nanny saying that to him, I was like

Don't jump into conclusions.... that's all I'm going to say

Omgg thank youuuu <3

(づ￣ ³￣)づ

Ermm when did she say that.....she told him the plain truth without knowing any back story she didn’t know he was forced on his wedding night....incase you forgot this is what she said
“The ML is a young and very agile given he’s sweet he still has desires which ain’t wrong and there are a lot of people who would want to sleep with him she’s not wrong and the worst thing that could happen is he likes someone else which isn’t wrong considering the times they lived in, except he won’t cause she doesn’t knows he’s re-living his life and she doesn’t know her ward was forced on his wedding night so what is your point exactly” don’t nitpick everything stating negative facts if you’re not going’to step back and consider other situations which someone else has also stated

I don’t understand what y’all are on about.....first off the nanny didn’t say anything wrong given the era they live in, this is exactly the reality of things which she’s obviously stating, secondly when did she say sleep with him now, she only said given he’s sweet to you know that he’s a man who has sexual needs and in the worst case scenario he’ll like someone else....which isn’t a lie or something that is surprising, given the ERA they live in, y’all should take all those into consideration and this modern way of thinking wasn’t exactly welcomed in those days okay and if the uke had told her the seme forced himself on him, she would have given a better advice but take other facts into play here okay

Thanks!!

You have to consider the time here. The nanny doesn’t know the situation or anything. Our ML aka princy boy, is a prince, so she’s right, he has tons of people wanting to sleep with him. Because of this and the fact that she doesn’t know that Mc has trauma, I think she’s kind of just assuming or thinking that our mc is kind of taking advantage of the ML’s patience or something like that. Due to all of that, she told him that he shouldn’t wait that long or anything cause ML is at a age where his hormones are wild and with his statue/power, he can go off with anyone and nobody would really care cause he’s a prince. Back in that time, advices were usually like that, some very aggressive to the point of force while in rare cases you have people who are genuinely trying to help without a clue like nanny. Also the other thing is, the manhua hasn’t exposed who put the drug in, so you can’t just assume that ML and nanny are forceful. Also, your quote was wrong, very wrong. She never said that and she didn’t say “it’s your duty and yada yada” she simply said (without a clue of why MC doesn’t wanna have sex yet again) that he shouldn’t wait too long, as in he can take his time but like not that longgg because she assumes that ML is just some horny prince and the classical mean impatient type of prince that were commonly found back then. Also having the favor of your husband was a huge thing back then, if your husband grows bored or tired of you and goes/sleeps with someone else, you could be shamed, lose your statues, be painted in a horrible light which kind of ruins your reputation, and other terrible things. And due to the ML statues, it would be so easy for him to just destroy someone’s life if he wanted to cause again HES A DUCKING PRINCE. Also MC’s self guilt tripping is also a common thing cause he thinks that ML is angry at him for not having sex with him and stuff (which he’s not, he’s really understanding and sweet), and he doesn’t want to lose this favor he has cause then he’s life is basically over, he can’t rise back up to have a good reputation cause he’s an illegitimate child, hated by his family and kind of kicked out of it, he’s a male wife, and he’s the reason why ML is so occupied to pay attention to other noble girls who have high statue families.

(Spoilers)







It’s actually that Song girl who ordered a servant to serve the drug.

I don’t care what era she’s in, she’s still wrong in the MODERN era, which is the era we live in. I’m pointing it out so anyone that reads this KNOWS it’s wrong because not everyone automatically knows it is. Knowing what is victim blaming and what’s not is very important, so pointing this kind of stuff out isn’t harming anyone. I can still enjoy the story while pointing out the flaws of the characters.

I'm not sure this was the purpose of your comment but if you say so.
Victim blaming is quite a specific word and doesn't apply to this situation.
I could say maybe it was guilt tripping, but nor the ML or the nanny did any of that.
Imagine going to someone explaining to them you have some conflicts with your spouse and you think he's mad at you because you didn't have any sexual activity after the wedding night. Sex being quite a big part of a couple intimacy I wouldn't find weird for someone to advice you to just go on and do it, since you didn't say why you didn't want to.

Now you talked about how the author was victim blaming... How ?
Like how else should they portray the main character internal conflict?
MC is sexually attracted to the ML but still can't go all the way with him. He doesn't know that ML is feeling remorseful about what happened and MC feels bad because ML is actually acting kindly.
They still didn't went over what happened that night, didn't talk about their feelings and MC is still wary of him.
With all this misunderstanding how should the author write the MC pov? And it's not like the story line is forcing MC into having sex even if he doesn't want to. More like the doubt are pushing the story so they can clear up ML intentions.
So easy with the words. I could understand if some people wouldn't get that it's fictional that everything is pushing towards the plot but still this story is quite morally neutral, not too bad.

Okay maybe victim blaming was not the right word but it's quite a close term for what is happening here, the self-harming thoughts the MC has.

In the manhua the MC never thought once " I want to kiss him " or " I want to have sex " but " I think he ( the ML ) wants to kiss me " or " will he be happy if I do that ". He only think about his husband's desires.

Moreover the ML doesn't need to " go over " that night since it's him who forcefully had sex with the MC. Only the MC has to go over since he's the victim.

And yes, it's fictional. But the problem is when we see all day mangas like this or worse ( in term of sexual assaults reactions ) and nobody tell us it's wrong, then some people will think it's right or normal.

I don’t recall ever saying that the author was victim blaming, where did you even reach that conclusion? And also, THATS the only thing you got from my comment? She’s definitely guilt tripping, but you can tell she’s implying that it would be HIS fault if his husband decided to sleep with other people. Which, given the situation wouldn’t be necessarily victim blaming, but it would be wrongfully saying that he should have pushed himself despite being not ready to engage in sex to avoid his husband sleeping with other people. And while I shouldn’t have inappropriately thrown around the term victim blaming, having this mindset is still harmful, regardless of the term.

I dont understand why you are pushing modern era views here lmao
People know that this kind of mindset is unacceptable in modern era alright? Jesus christ do you need to please your partner through sex nowadays, no, I dont think so plus people arent princes of dynasties anymore where pleasing the higher ups is important. No need to point it out captain obvious. We are reading this to witness an authors capability to write and entertain us not point fingers like “ew authors are always like this they always write plots that is victim blaming” without even reading the whole story and just jumping to conclusions.

Plus Read stories with an open mind, UNDERSTAND this is just fictional that will entertain us. if the prince does something upsetting it doesnt affect modern era its just a story and if you are somewhat seeing a story as a set to norm like since abuse is so common in stories you read so its going to be emulated irl then i unfortunately will have to advice you to get your head checked.

Dont ruin this webtoon for yourself by comparing how good your values are irl vs the values of a story that is supposedly historical. Read with an open mind. Be patient and just watch it unfold then if the story is shit then complain.

It’s as if you didn’t read my comments at all. Not everyone reading this automatically knows that this behavior is unacceptable. That is why we’re pointing it out. It’s ignorant to assume that everyone has learned that this is wrong. Why are you so bothered by people pointing out what is obviously wrong? This in itself does not ruin my experience because I understand that there will inevitably be characters who are not perfectly moral, but that does not mean that I am not allowed to point of flaws in characters.