*inserts "who invited him" meme* because that is how you sound.
And for someone who loves the word "complexity", you refuse to acknowledge that complex stories do have prejudices, biased and agenda.
And yes, the conversation between me and that sex offender who started the drama was not necessary, and so does your comment.
And if you think feminist comments calling out misogyny is a sign of black-and-white thinking, it says more about you.
Why do lots of mangago readers can't take criticism.
Non-existent Gods forbid we get bothered by bigotry
Calling out misogyny and riding on it are two completely different things. Having an opinion is never the issue; refusing to acknowledge or engage with any perspective other than your own is. And honestly, girl, you’re the one who seems incapable of taking any criticism without immediately becoming defensive. I’d genuinely suggest interacting with people outside your own bubble and learning to engage with perspectives you don’t necessarily agree with.
Nothing you wrote made sense.
Thank you for your fake concern, and rest assured, I do interact with people in real life and take disagreements very well, but not to the detriment of my women and girls' peace and well-being.
And I am doing to hold your hand with a glove, when i tell you that every story is misogynistic as there are always biases and prejudices towards women and girls.
If you think being strong-willed and straightforward is being defensive, it shows that you hate radical feminists, and engage with the pacifist, submissive ones who are nice (not to confuse with kind).
And which criticism are you talking about?
I made a comment and engaged with others respectfully, but because @Hunny whom I have blocked long ago and never interacted with until that incident accused me of stuff I never wrote, I rightfully got annoyed.
You're just conversing in bad faith, and it's obvious you don't see sexism as a systemic issue
You're glossing over the fact that lots of people don't engage with others in good faith and are devil's advocates.
You're either naive or obnoxious to think that people do owe performative kindness to sex offenders, bigots or devil's advocates who love playing the centrists
LITERALLY, theyre both deranged imo. Robin boiled ML and FL down to "scared small female, and Big large scary man who can snap her neck" but lables themselves a radical feminist despite enforcing toxic gender roles onto the characters....i dont even wanna get started on Hunny cause thats a wholeeee separate issue cause fym youre using slurs to get your non existent point across
YUPPPP thank you
Girl???????? When exactly did I defend Hunny????? If anything, I’ve been against him from the beginning. You’ve somehow taken “their reading of the situation is reductive” and translated that into me being a devil’s advocate?????? like what?????? Those are two entirely different claims.
I never said misogyny shouldn’t be called out, never defended him, and never even said your criticism of him was wrong. You’re introducing an entire argument I never made and then arguing against it.
And disagreeing with you does not suddenly make me anti-feminist, pro-men, or a “devil’s advocate.” I can be a feminist, recognise sexism as systemic, and still think your reading of a story is reductive. Those things are not mutually exclusive.
Maybe engage with what I actually said instead of assigning me a position and then getting angry at me for holding it.
I FUCKING KNOW RIGHT??????? OMG TY
Feminism and pro-men is an oxymoron.
If you think, me, being rightfully annoyed and disappointed at male-centred readers about chapter 33, is being reductive, so be it. Have a day you deserve.
Lies, lies
If stating the biological fact that males are physically stronger than females, and the male lead is physically stronger than her is madness, so be it.
It shows how much non-radical feminists will always side with patriarchy and neoliberalism.
Writing that "my black-and-white" comment is at the same level of that rapist apologist's who started that crap, and suddenly changing the topic is gaslighting.
It's fine, I was wrong for wasting my time with fake Epstein haters (reference to the educational video made by Elliot Sang)
(Replying to robin thru your comment so disregard this) Fun fact every male is a "biological" male, sex is not smth that can be changed, GENDER is the social construct here, not sex. Like I said before Males and females store muscle DIFFERENTLY, women more so in the lower body and men in the upper body, thats a displacement of muscle and doesnt actually equate to actual physical strength OR biology as muscle distribution ISNT A COOKIE CUTTER PROCESS, its literally just genes. If me disagreeing with you MISOGYNISTIC take is somehow upholding the patriarchy (its not. Your take is, infact misogynistic and patriarchy fueled rhetoric) then so be it, cause i dont see cis, trans, or whatever identifying woman as weaker than a man. So whos the actual feminist here? Cause its not you
Idk how you're still holding space for her to learn cause she lacks cognitive thinking skills. Shes so convinced anyone who disagrees with her takes even SLIGHTLY is somehow anti-woman or holding up patriarchal values, as if her own argument doesnt do that itself. No one is playing devil's advocate and thats all she can say in retort to people who have a valid argument against her. Im also still tryna figure out who even implied sexism and misogyny aren't systemic, cause it wasnt us.
To that fake Epstein hater, I never stated the fact that males (the sex) are physically stronger than females.
Sorry that you drank the neoliberalism drink
*I stated that males (the sex
@robin the fake feminist, in NO medical books does it EVER say that males are weaker than females, thats MISOGYNY. If you Crack open any medical book or do a simple Google search it never claims that males are stronger it claims that MUSCLE is DISTRIBUTED differently. And physicality is MUTLIFACETED. So your claim that males are stronger than women is NOT a fact, is patriarchal fueled rhetoric to keep women as victims and the idea that theyre incapable of violence which obviously isnt true and misogyny. Your coined little "neoliberalism" term as an insult doesnt work here cause literally nothing i said aligns with it. Stop using words you just learned when it doesnt pertain to the conversation
Also did this racist kpop addict call ME an a fake epstine hater as if her weirdo idols dont have SA, racism, and CA issues. baby the call is coming from INSIDE the house
If me having a pfp of a kpop idol and being a radical feminist is racist and terf, so be it .
I sleep comfortably knowing I will never be a fake Epstein hater who thinks that coercion is only done through brutal force/force which is pro rape culture.
And says the one who reads Reverse thinking ,.what happened to "not everything is black and white" preaching?
Never mind, I was wrong for arguing with fake Epstein haters :(
Was it really that serious for both of them to argue over it bluds really picked black and white and ran with it. They completely missed the complexity of the characters and the story, just picked their own narrative and stuck to it. Like dude, why are you reading such a complex story if you’re only capable of seeing everything as black and white