People love to throw the words “romanticizing,” “bird,” “Stockholm syndrome” (which, btw, is a media term), and all that around, and it just comes off as bitterness.
“I want toxic yaoi where there isn’t rape!” *Gets one with actual nuance in the toxic dynamics but is a love triangle.* “*Gasp* Romanticizing abuse!”
*Second ML sexually assaults MC.* “But-but the author said he isn’t a rapist, though!” “TJ is a rapist!”And the dude has never raped or sexually assaulted Ian.
There is a difference between having a flawed, nuanced relationship that is toxic and endorsing an abusive relationship. If you read Wetsand and think it’s endorsing that, maybe try improving your reading comprehension.
People love to throw the words “romanticizing,” “bird,” “Stockholm syndrome” (which, btw, is a media term), and all that around, and it just comes off as bitterness.
“I want toxic yaoi where there isn’t rape!”
*Gets one with actual nuance in the toxic dynamics but is a love triangle.*
“*Gasp* Romanticizing abuse!”
*Second ML sexually assaults MC.*
“But-but the author said he isn’t a rapist, though!”
“TJ is a rapist!”And the dude has never raped or sexually assaulted Ian.
There is a difference between having a flawed, nuanced relationship that is toxic and endorsing an abusive relationship. If you read Wetsand and think it’s endorsing that, maybe try improving your reading comprehension.