If you find double standards frustrating and disgusting don't recommend and it doesn't matter if he changed the fact that she stayed loyal before marriage and he didn't is enough and I totally get the sociality think but why are you mentioning the injustice, misogynist sociality can't we just bury it under and normalize equal rights and justice
can you not fucking read. Ines wanted and even encouraged him to “cheat” because they didn’t have a relationship to begin with. They were literally engaged in political terms when they were children and Ines basically ghosted him his whole life, so no there was no relationship to cheat with in the beginning. The whole point of Ines picking him in this lifetime was that Ines didn’t want a committed relationship so they could divorce. Im so sick of these fucking comments, just shut the fuck up if you have no reading comprehension.
can you not fucking read. Ines wanted and even encouraged him to “cheat” because they didn’t have a relationship to begin with. They were literally engaged in political terms when they were children and I... remmiiii
Did you read the romance tag of course many will not like romanticizing a virgin (in this live) fl having a relationship with a playboy and it's so unrealistic like what do you mean he will only have fun with others until they became married, like he flips his sexual desires from a new girl every other day to one woman for live and many are mad because the author mad the world setting in a romance novel normalizes men cheating but not women, if you want to display fl struggling through misogyny the ml should not be displayed as the perfect husband but as a regular husband who desires other woman after marriage even if he doesn't cheat and make it fully realistic old times setting, and like I said the non committed were only on his side , she could have had some secret lovers before so they are one the same bot if the author wants to romanticize the relationship
Did you read the romance tag of course many will not like romanticizing a virgin (in this live) fl having a relationship with a playboy and it's so unrealistic like what do you mean he will only have fun with o... Orabelleseacoast
If you find double standards frustrating and disgusting don't recommend and it doesn't matter if he changed the fact that she stayed loyal before marriage and he didn't is enough and I totally get the sociality think but why are you mentioning the injustice, misogynist sociality can't we just bury it under and normalize equal rights and justice
can you not fucking read. Ines wanted and even encouraged him to “cheat” because they didn’t have a relationship to begin with. They were literally engaged in political terms when they were children and Ines basically ghosted him his whole life, so no there was no relationship to cheat with in the beginning. The whole point of Ines picking him in this lifetime was that Ines didn’t want a committed relationship so they could divorce. Im so sick of these fucking comments, just shut the fuck up if you have no reading comprehension.
Did you read the romance tag of course many will not like romanticizing a virgin (in this live) fl having a relationship with a playboy and it's so unrealistic like what do you mean he will only have fun with others until they became married, like he flips his sexual desires from a new girl every other day to one woman for live and many are mad because the author mad the world setting in a romance novel normalizes men cheating but not women, if you want to display fl struggling through misogyny the ml should not be displayed as the perfect husband but as a regular husband who desires other woman after marriage even if he doesn't cheat and make it fully realistic old times setting, and like I said the non committed were only on his side , she could have had some secret lovers before so they are one the same bot if the author wants to romanticize the relationship
You are right