i think we as readers can be too quick to call a backstory a sob story, and sometimes an characters past explained can feel sloppy and like a nonverbal apology. But a bad person doesn’t just appear, they’re a product of generations of trauma, enabling, and lack of moral guidance in their developmental years. I actually think Lorenzo’s father getting irrational and angry, even hurting Lorenzo might be a perfect portrayal that though he loves his child, tries to look out for him, he’s still a product of his own father’s parenting. It can feel annoying when you have to hear how miserable a bad person’s life is, and in no way shape or form would that ever be an apology or repentance, but i think a character born to be *just and conveniently* evil is an easy route to avoid layers and depth to developing a character. Anyways that’s my two cents or maybe it’s just nonsense.
you worded it so perfectly like hell ofc it doesn't excuse what they did but it gives you an insight on how and why they turned out that way ! cause really, a person's environment affect them big time—where would he learn to be normal when everyone around him is a psycho (?) theres this famous character who has a perfect life and a loving brother (from a very famous story) really has no reason to be the way he is but hes j pure fucking evil for no reason at all and people still ate that up.
Tbf, that last part you described CAN happen in the very rare cases of actual psychopaths who experience even a slight childhood neglect. But those are honestly the tiny exception.
Everyone else is a product of the behaviors they experienced and were modelled to them as kids, combined with their genetics to a smaller degree.
And like you both said, these background stories act as an explanation, a deeper view into a character and what they'd been through, not as a justification or excuse. Readers don't owe to suddenly turn our views around completely just because of it, the actions of a fully grown man as he is today are still his responsibility.
Admittedly, there ARE occasions where authors do intend to elicit specific favorable views and feelings towards a cruel character and have them be redeemed, in the way they portray those past events and how they tie them into the present or how they have other characters react upon finding out. That's to say, when it doesn't feel organic, but forced.
I'll be honest that I'm not a big fan of this author's approach exactly because the whole rape incident went away literally with a slap of the wrist (ok, one slap on the face), so I don't trust them to do any redemption organically, but at least I appreciate reading of Lorenzo's past.
yeah i understand what you’re saying but this would land better with readers if the author had treated the sa and violence towards the mc with the same nuance and they didn’t. when the only character afforded expansion and grace is the violent offender, audiences are gonna have a hard time not feeling like the author is using his backstory as an excuse or justification instead of a simple opportunity to provide depth to the story. i like this story a lot as most of us in this comment section do so these complaints are less about the proposed “morality” of enzo and more about the unsatisfactory way the author is presenting this specific storyline so far and it’s over all impact on the story.
yes absolutely, i want to be clear that SA is the most inhumane, and disgusting crime i believe a person can commit against another, its so stripping of autonomy and dignity. my original comment truly only served as my own insight on backstories, and in no way would i ever see them as justification. it was more directed towards fellow readers, because at the end of the day the author can’t see my thoughts, if they could i would have a lot to say about the handling of the SA in this story. i don’t want to have my message be interpreted as an apologist message for an offender, i truly apologize if it came off that way
you worded this wonderfully, and i really didn’t think my comment would spark any discussion, the character who’s backstory i truly want to know is Uno, his reactions and thoughts have made him such an original character to me. i meant my comment as a general observation on literature (do manhwas count as literature?) but im gonna work on time and place
The more BA I read, the more unnecessary the SAs feel like lol. Like, they were already unnecessary to begin with, but absolutely NOTHING has added a smidge of explanation as to why Lorenzo would go that far other than “lol he’s just psycho”. The manhwa would have been a solid 10 if those scenes were written a bit differently.
There’s a scene where Rian says something like “you can’t keep sticking it in man!” and Lorenzo responds by saying “I thought you liked it.” I honestly can’t tell if he genuinely thinks that or if it’s another bad joke of his. Like there’s no way he thinks Rian liked it, but SA is so normalized in BL that I really can’t tell.









god forbid a man wear his whitey tightys like damn, yk cotton is ideal for skin health in the genital area like
Not you trying to defend his honour