why r people saying they want more couple screen time i feel like the most interesting parts of the story is the plot and characters. all the characters are really interesting (except valentine) but i wish the story was less rushed to flesh them out. like i thought kitty’s reliance on sexual validation to hide insecurity was interesting and the sister brother characters were complex
Because it's an underdeveloped part of the story. We barely know anything about val, and it makes readers curious. You yourself said val isn't interesting and that's because the author barely writes her, or gives her any depth or growth.
The world building is amazing so I wasn't complaining much, but when u tag something yuri people will start expecting yuri u know
Tbh, the apocalyptic aspect of "only 1% of men are born and we all mistreat them like object" is so unbelievable and unrealistic. Knowing how society and women irl are, the little men left would be protected than mistreated. There has been plenty of old society where there are less men due to the loss of war (China used to send 100,000 men to die in a stupid war), and men were NOT mistreated. It's simply biologically impossible for women to treat men like sexual object where we kill each other to harvest their sperms. I just can't see it happening, so all these evil hypocritical female characters just makes no sense to me, and come across as extremely uninteresting.
Now. A toxic lesbian character are a thing, and woefully unexplored in fiction. So I'm soaking up Valentine's moment in the story, as limited as they are.
Idk if what I'm gonna say is true but I think the plot is really interesting it shows that men are being treated the way women are (not the shelters tho) the story it's self talks alot my racism and sexism but if you are only reading it for the lesbians then it makes sense why u don't see it interesting since we till now barely see any of Val and Jess interactions
It could have been interesting, I'm reading the whole passage through, but it's unsound and implausible if this world exist. It's all doom and gloom with little to no good humanity. Everyone's out for blood. I understand most people wants to compare patriarchy to a fictional matriarchy, but humanity would never turn to trafficking as a normal society. You're free to enjoy the story, I just find it meh.
Okay apart from the personaly preferences, the latest comments here have been pretty interesting, because in my eyes a world without men wouldve actually have been a utopia.
Growing up I have constantly heard news of rapes, female foeticide, honor killings and other horrific crimes against women, so for me, a world where these the perpetrators of patriarchy don't exist in large enough numbers to harm women, I would have activitly choosen to make sure humanity just exists as is with a few men for reproduction. But despite this being a so called utopia, the women in this manhwa still uphold patriarchy, still center themselves around men be trying to "solve" the crisis, or seeking validation from men (like in the case of kitty), and most women are still unempathetic towards the struggles of other women (like in the case of hanna's mom having been raped).
It's interesting to see that classisim and racism still exist even if men don't exist, I wonder why the women (in general) in the manhwa didn't unite over eradicating such issues? Because presently, I see on twitter, women talking about how men are same no matter the country, that they will oppress women in some new flavour across all cultures.
Their biggest issue just seems to be wanting to solve the gender crisis in this manhwa.
Why not focus on other fields restricted for women in our present age like science and technology?
Why hasn't there been any other novel breakthroughs? Why not develop the artificial womb that was mentioned in this manhwa earlier even further so women don't have to bear the burden of bearing male offspring, when sometimes it also happens to be rape like in case of hanna's mom?
Idk, I still keep feeling for a manhwa that's about a world with little men and woman are the dominant sex, they still seem to center themselves around men a lot
I hope they show more anecdotes and perspectives of women in this world and their lives in general, or maybe show how the women who were oppressed by men in the past feel now in a world without their oppressors.
lmao. you made all this up because you can't imagine a world were women act just like men when they have power. There are women who act like the ones depicted in the story and we live in "patriarchy" Women traffic other women, they are part of gangs and they commit sexual violence and murder. You haven't studied ways in which men have been oppressed. It's uncomfortable to you because you think women aren't capable to harm the way men are. Im here to tell you, its not the case. Women and their harm is explained away and dismissed as not as harmful as men. A world with just women will have the same problem we face now. it would just look different. Women are not a monolith.
lmao. and your a fucking loser bio essentialist that think women are not as bad as men by the virtue of being women. You're the fucking loser that erasing real victims of violence perpetuated by women. FUCKING LOSER. You're one of those weird ones that thinks harm is only concentrated in men. Loser. lmao. That's the loser thing to do.
Ignore them they are a troll no woman was in a rape training academy with tens and millions of men, no women raped Gisele pelicot, no women formed an island named after themselves to traffick children and eat them.
Women would have been involved, but they never have done harm in the same capacity men have and its documented.
Lmao. I’m not a troll and we can go there if yall want. You’re highlighting Gisele to show what? That men can rape? News flash women are rapist as well. There was no rape academy. And yall going to act like women aren’t ever coercive and ever drugged their partner ? . Even if that was to ever get to the news, yall would act like she didn’t do it. What’s the argument here? That women haven’t drugged or raped? Lmao.
Lmao. Women harm in society always gets minimised by people like yourself and that other fucking loser. A woman killed 2 of her autistic kids couple months ago? One murders a girl what she thought was dating her boyfriend, another one killed her boyfriend couple weeks ago. What capacity are yall talking about? Lmao. At the height of the British empire, it was a woman at the height of it. Yall precious women owned enslaved Africans. They also voted trump in. And yall want to talk about capacity? Women commit crime by proxy as well.
Y’all’s argument will only ever make sense if women as a group have never committed crime in any capacity as never. Only then can yall argue they don’t have the same capacity. Outside of that , it all bio essentialist arguments which erase women who have been victims of other women violence. Thats the enraging part. Which is part a lot of people are shocked at the depiction of women in this work lmao. Calling me troll for saying women have the same capacity to enact violence. Go and see how violent women are to children. Talking about “capacity”. Be for real.
Also u said the academy doesn't exist:
https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2026/03/world/expose-rape-assault-online-vis-intl/index.html
Lmao. That article that everyone is misquoting and not centring the women who have been victimised? Lmao. The 62 million was a visit to a porn site. Not to a rape academy. And 62 million visits includes women as well.
Go and read the article and elevate the women voices and stop propagating misinformation. Tf. What the article found is serious in its right without the lie about rape academy that’s been going around,
What an interesting set of questions. Lmao creating tracking islands. A woman facilitated the trafficking of those women. We’ve all seeing the S file where women were offering their kids? There was a pedo case a while back that a women facilitated - she facilitated access to her baby so he can assault the baby boy? What you talking about ? Have you not heard of the case where the sister raped her younger sister alongside her boyfriend?
And on rape… you know what the gag is? Many countries don’t even have rape defined as someone a woman can do.
What you talking about? Your argument is women don’t have the same capacity. And I’ve given you instances were they committed the same harm the men committing to show they definitely had/have the capability. Talking about my arguments fall flat. My argument being women have the same capacity to harm? Lmao. You can’t give me an instance where women as a group never harmed so your argument of capacity is what’s falling flat.
I haven't man, that's why I asked for statistics and proof. You still can't seem to provide proof of how men are similarly equal in power to men and can commit the same crimes as men. And you also dismissed official news source i provided you. So I hope u take your schizophrenia meds and stop living in a fantasy world.
And @lemonkun ur pathetic after calling be names You run and change the setting of your comment so I can’t respond to you saying I’m absurd. I will put it here cos I know you’ll see it.
I’m only absurd to you because you’re suffering from cognitive dissonance. I treat women the same I treat men. Unlike you and the other loser and people in the society at large, I don’t think women are some category that’s exempt from evil doing or have less capacity of doing it. Your position is what’s funny and absurd.
Another reply to you.
What you’re talking about women in power? Lmao. Women are commit crimes now and they are not “in power” the source you provided was to support your misinformation. It’s not news to anything that men commit crimes. It’s u living in a fantasy world asking me to prove that women in power commit the same crime as men. You hasn’t heard of the British empire ? When the queen was ruling did she act any different than the men? What about magaret thatcher ? Was she compassionate? . You obviously haven’t studied women involvement in the enslaved of Africans . Talking “proof”. Women facilitating the trafficking and rape of children isn’t proof and I’m the one whose supposedly “psychophrenic”
I hope you don’t engaging in ad hominem attacks. When you’re appeal to authority fallacy didn’t work you resulted to calling me names. You guys have such a bio essentialist arguments and devaluing women to the point that someone point this out gets branded crazy. Lmao. But women are lovely people right ?
Everybody has the same capacity for evil - no shit, does that mean you've committed? You're confusing it with intent and results. Blaming women for Epstein is crazy , considering it's "Epstein island" not "Maxwell's". You really couldn't wait to play the victim. And you're falling for the fallacy that equality = sameness, I don't need to tell you the basic common sense that men and women are not the same right? Socially, sexually, genetically? There are plenty examples of "matriarchy" if you're curious enough to research them, none of the men are oppressed. Women would rule a very different society from men, that much is proven. Stop being stupid.
kimoto is a a parasite bug from a demon’s brain. silver hair is the heart. silver hair was psycho as a kid. tehir gets stronger the more narcissistic he is (big ego = big halo). silver hair don’t like that tehir was basically using kimoto to feed his ego, because silver hair related to kimoto since they both demon parts. so silver hair broke tehir by making him paralyzed, which completely shattered his ego, thus making tehir powerless. kimoto liked tehir but after finding out that he was actually a bug, became depressed. he accidentally slips that he liked tehir for 10 years, which feeds tehir ego, thus why he regained power (halo) for a moment. however kimoto still depressed and knows tehir loves himself not kimoto, so kimoto embraces becoming bug. blue hair evil guy wants to use tehir to revive charin, probably because they r related (both have blond hair red eyes and red bumps)
kimoto and tehirs story is honestly pretty interesting and sad, stop ignoring the plot guys
Many readers are just "oh my baby badass Jin when will you get your Charin back and have a lovey-dovey life, you always have been right, and I hope green hair and Tehir die". I love Jin but this story has an actual plot, very good worldbuilding, several interesting and complex main characters -- it's not just about Jin x Charin and their relationship.
i only started reading this because i saw all the comments thirsting over maru and i am not disappointed
https://x.com/_chamuring
Ur wish is my command









the writing fries me i love it