Shota/Lolis already make me uncomfortable because they look like YOUNG children. Like YOUNG. Even if they're thousands of years old it's still fucking gross, they look like literal kindergartners. If you're into that shit then; what the fuck. Stop reading, go get help. Just because it's legal in my country doesn't make it right. 2 reply
sad that we have to refer to our shitass justice system to get y’all to stop. Srsly please stop...
1 reply
If you live in America and read shota
[Question]
08 01,2021
YOU ARE BREAKING CHILD P/RN/GRAPHY LAWS.
“ Images of child p/rn/graphy are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child p/rn/graphy as any visual depiction of s3xually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age).”
“ Under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, sections 62-68 made it a criminal offence to be in possession of “prohibited images” of children. This is defined closely to require that the image is first grossly offensive and obscene, and p/rn/graphic for purposes of s3xual arousal. It also requires that the focus is principally on the child’s g3nit4ls and s3xual regions, or includes one of various s3xual acts either with the child or in the presence of the child. It also covers images that depict s3xua activity in the presence of or between children and an animal, whether dead, alive, or imaginary.
The law covers still and moving images, and can include cartoons, drawings, and manga-style images. These images are easier to find on the internet than actual child abuse images involving real children, largely due to the fact that virtual pornography is not illegal in all countries. For example, the existence of Japanese websites featuring fantasy child s3xual abuse”
If you don’t object to shota for moral reasons (which you absolutely should object. It’s f/cking disgusting) you should stop reading it because for legal reasons. You are legally classified as a s3x offender.
“ Images of child p/rn/graphy are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child p/rn/graphy as any visual depiction of s3xually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age).”
“ Under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, sections 62-68 made it a criminal offence to be in possession of “prohibited images” of children. This is defined closely to require that the image is first grossly offensive and obscene, and p/rn/graphic for purposes of s3xual arousal. It also requires that the focus is principally on the child’s g3nit4ls and s3xual regions, or includes one of various s3xual acts either with the child or in the presence of the child. It also covers images that depict s3xua activity in the presence of or between children and an animal, whether dead, alive, or imaginary.
The law covers still and moving images, and can include cartoons, drawings, and manga-style images. These images are easier to find on the internet than actual child abuse images involving real children, largely due to the fact that virtual pornography is not illegal in all countries. For example, the existence of Japanese websites featuring fantasy child s3xual abuse”
If you don’t object to shota for moral reasons (which you absolutely should object. It’s f/cking disgusting) you should stop reading it because for legal reasons. You are legally classified as a s3x offender.
Regretted story
[Answer]
08 01,2021
Regretted story
[Answer]
08 01,2021
Regretted story
[Answer]
08 01,2021
Regretted story
[Answer]
08 01,2021
