No, for the same reasons abstinence only sex ed is stupid. Keeping kids away from the problem without actually solving the problem itself won't do anything. One day they're gonna have to use the internet, and if you prevent them from learning how to do that safely then they're just going to be in more danger. reply
Yes and no
Rather than removing them completed from the internet. I just add fuckinh safety features , limit screen time with different stuff
Like the phone probably will only have , the camera feature , 1 or two kids app and yt with no Wi-Fi. I will download some shows like “xiao pang” and some stuff I pre-watch to make sure it safe for my ...... reply
I get 15 below but lol 16 seems an appropriate gap since technically at that age technology is pretty much needed and age where one can think and handle consequences of their actions. When consequences i mean be fucking smart enough to not do a trend. I mean at that point you need to learn how to have email adress and be aware of current issues but...... reply
Kinda yes, kinda no?
I mean, it would be better if there was a way to filter out the pornographic content and some hateful things. Otherwise, taking away the internet entirely would not help in building one's own view of the current political landscape or the world outside of what's taught at homes and communities. reply
Hypocrite bitch why would you remove anyone from internet mind your own business kids have their parents you don't need to worry about them (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧ 2 reply
Yes I hate and I mean hate the whole pipeline of finding literally porn at a young age and people making being hypersexual their whole personality. it's not cute and we And I mean WE would know as users of this site how young people are fucking themselves in the brain because of it. reply
