Sorry, guys! During system maintenance, some functions like comment are unavailable.
Is any/all forms of generalization bad?
Like even generalizations against the rich, white people, cishet, men?
Asking because I woke up to a reddit post under the subreddit r/changemyview titled, "CMV: Modern day feminism generalizes against men in ways that would consider racist, xenophobic, or bigoted if used against other groups - especially when using offender statistics" and OP tried to paint how the way people generalize men online would come of as wrong if the same language was used to talk about other minorities. Someone in the comments pointed out how generalizations are more accepted to groups that are seen in power, like the rich, white people, cishet people etc. and though the commenter understand this precedance they still dislike generalizations at large.
Most pointed out to OP though that, what they are claiming is modern feminism in their post, is just an extreme being rewarded online and by the algorithm. Most feminists aren't like this in the real world.
I was just curious on your guy's thoughts on the generalizations part? Do you guys think some forms of generalization aren't that concerning like generalizing groups that have systemic power? For me I've never questioned it.
Or do you guys think all forms of generalization is bad and that more nuanced and accurate language should be encouraged/used instead?
no, not all forms of generalisation are bad. it depends on the context in which the statement is being made
many generalisations are used in a way not to point fingers at an entire group, but instead to make a point. take ACAB for example; obviously not EVERY single cop to exist is bad, and there may still be a small minority of cops that don't pa...... reply
