Sharing page 1959 (598418)

do u guys think sunsun is real i think they’re real and fucking

Any ppl here who used to ship taekook back in the days, and now have woken up? What made u realize that it wasn't real?


I would watch a lot of taekook analysis videos and it was literally my favorite thing to do as I get home from school TT namjin was my GOATTT, used to rlly believe they were tgt too. And honorable mention is yoonmin(and sope ngl), but I just felt bad tat the other members didn't have any pairings tbh LMAO

A manga/ Webtoon? That was adapted into a short series. Two male leads—not BL. They’re friends in university I think and they share an apartment? One of them wears glasses and the has hair around his ears I think. There’s this scene I recall where one of the is using the bathroom and the other accidentally sees him showering? It’s a running gag because there’s a window in the bathroom leading to the hallway. It was really funny. Help me please yall

I'm not trying to have a debate or a conversation about certain critiques in this post, I'm just asking straight up isn't this misogyny?

Isn't denying female readers nuance for what they read misogyny? As if we don't live or society wasn't built on patriarchy that has shaped how women lived, what experiences they had, how they cope with the world. Like I'm not trying to say critiques aren't allowed but when we don't take into account or try to care for the nuance of why women engage with or write certain stories, relying on one-note assumptions or assessments, isn't that just straight up misogyny? I think it's interesting how nuance is demanded with things like "not all men" but no nuance is considered for women, especially when it comes to the stories they engage with. Again im not saying critiques can't happen, I don't mind if critiques happen, but I don't understand why critiques must become sweeping judgements and generalization of women that becomes the general idea of how we view those women, despite whatever nuance they have or give, when also on the flip side people are more vigilant in generalizing men going "not all men".

I think critiques are valid to make and have but I think the nuance should also be engaged with, not to justify, but to address the root problems. Don't you guys think so too? And if we don't care to give women nuance or engage with their nuance, to the point where we rarely do and instead run on the sweeping generalizations we make of them, what does that say about us? Aren't we now the pawns of patriarchy, doing it's job for it? Blaming women, excerting most if not all our energy on deeming a 'bad'/'unpleasant' women and putting them down, deflecting from the primary boogeyman/puppet master the patriarchy.

I also think it's interesting about what rights we think we have to deny a group their nuance and their context of being under a systemic power. Are we saying or telling them they aren't /that/ affected by that system? Why do we feel the need to do that? To impose our judgements over their nuance? Isn't this a power play? I could go on but I'm stopping here.